| Concrete tinted more than standard (light beige) | |
|---|---|
| 3 |
- 11
( 24%)
|
| 5 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 1 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 4 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 2 |
- 6
( 13%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
| Color change between walls, barriers, bridge | |
| 5 |
- 11
( 24%)
|
| 2 |
- 11
( 24%)
|
| 3 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 4 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 1 |
- 5
( 11%)
|
| 45 - Overall Total | |
| (1= least tinting, 5= dark reddish/brownish tint)Level of tint preferred | |
| 3 |
- 9
( 25%)
|
| 2 |
- 8
( 22%)
|
| 1 |
- 8
( 22%)
|
| 5 |
- 6
( 17%)
|
| 4 |
- 5
( 14%)
|
| 36 - Overall Total | |
| Ashlar Stone | |
| 5 |
- 18
( 42%)
|
| 1 |
- 10
( 23%)
|
| 4 |
- 9
( 21%)
|
| 3 |
- 4
( 9%)
|
| 2 |
- 2
( 5%)
|
| 43 - Overall Total | |
| Bush Hammered | |
| 1 |
- 14
( 36%)
|
| 2 |
- 9
( 23%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 21%)
|
| 4 |
- 8
( 21%)
|
| 39 - Overall Total | |
| Exposed Aggregate | |
| 1 |
- 13
( 33%)
|
| 5 |
- 8
( 21%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 21%)
|
| 2 |
- 6
( 15%)
|
| 4 |
- 4
( 10%)
|
| 39 - Overall Total | |
| Fractured Fin | |
| 1 |
- 21
( 54%)
|
| 2 |
- 11
( 28%)
|
| 4 |
- 4
( 10%)
|
| 3 |
- 2
( 5%)
|
| 5 |
- 1
( 3%)
|
| 39 - Overall Total | |
| Fractured Granite | |
| 1 |
- 12
( 31%)
|
| 2 |
- 10
( 26%)
|
| 3 |
- 9
( 23%)
|
| 4 |
- 6
( 15%)
|
| 5 |
- 2
( 5%)
|
| 39 - Overall Total | |
| Geometric | |
| 1 |
- 18
( 47%)
|
| 2 |
- 9
( 24%)
|
| 5 |
- 5
( 13%)
|
| 3 |
- 4
( 11%)
|
| 4 |
- 2
( 5%)
|
| 38 - Overall Total | |
| Raised Surface | |
| 1 |
- 11
( 28%)
|
| 4 |
- 11
( 28%)
|
| 5 |
- 7
( 18%)
|
| 3 |
- 6
( 15%)
|
| 2 |
- 4
( 10%)
|
| 39 - Overall Total | |
| Concrete Stamping - Tentatively, a logo or icon to be determined could be stamped into the concrete at regular intervals. How important do you think stamping the concrete with a unique Clinton County logo or icon is? 1= least important, 5= very important | |
| 5 |
- 17
( 38%)
|
| 1 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 3 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 4 |
- 6
( 13%)
|
| 2 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 45 - Overall Total | |
| Installation of Landscaping in General | |
| 5 |
- 31
( 67%)
|
| 4 |
- 8
( 17%)
|
| 3 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 2 |
- 2
( 4%)
|
| 1 |
- 2
( 4%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
| Landscaping with Trees | |
| 5 |
- 22
( 47%)
|
| 4 |
- 14
( 30%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 17%)
|
| 1 |
- 2
( 4%)
|
| 2 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 47 - Overall Total | |
| Landscaping with Wildflowers | |
| 5 |
- 21
( 46%)
|
| 4 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 3 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 2 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 1 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
| Landscaping with Grass (mowed) | |
| 5 |
- 18
( 39%)
|
| 1 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 17%)
|
| 2 |
- 5
( 11%)
|
| 4 |
- 5
( 11%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
| Landscaped, Stone pediment (ground) signage | |
| 5 |
- 22
( 47%)
|
| 4 |
- 11
( 23%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 17%)
|
| 2 |
- 3
( 6%)
|
| 1 |
- 3
( 6%)
|
| 47 - Overall Total | |
| Decorative pole sign, metal, etc. | |
| 3 |
- 12
( 27%)
|
| 5 |
- 11
( 24%)
|
| 1 |
- 9
( 20%)
|
| 4 |
- 7
( 16%)
|
| 2 |
- 6
( 13%)
|
| 45 - Overall Total | |
| Crosswalks--How important are different improvement options to crosswalks downtown? (1=dislike, 5=like very much) | |
| 5 |
- 27
( 59%)
|
| 4 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 3 |
- 7
( 15%)
|
| 1 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 2 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
Decorative materials, different than the pavement | |
| 5 |
- 19
( 43%)
|
| 4 |
- 13
( 30%)
|
| 3 |
- 11
( 25%)
|
| 1 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 44 - Overall Total | |
| Or, just repainted, standard design | |
| 1 |
- 12
( 36%)
|
| 2 |
- 9
( 27%)
|
| 3 |
- 8
( 24%)
|
| 4 |
- 2
( 6%)
|
| 5 |
- 2
( 6%)
|
| 33 - Overall Total | |
Pole-mounted area maps downtown
| |
| 5 |
- 20
( 43%)
|
| 4 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 3 |
- 7
( 15%)
|
| 2 |
- 6
( 13%)
|
| 1 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
Combined route signage
| |
| 5 |
- 20
( 43%)
|
| 4 |
- 19
( 41%)
|
| 3 |
- 6
( 13%)
|
| 2 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
Decorative Street Name Signs
| |
| 5 |
- 22
( 55%)
|
| 4 |
- 10
( 25%)
|
| 3 |
- 6
( 15%)
|
| 2 |
- 2
( 5%)
|
| 40 - Overall Total | |
| Like the new signage design | |
| 5 |
- 16
( 36%)
|
| 3 |
- 13
( 29%)
|
| 4 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 2 |
- 4
( 9%)
|
| 1 |
- 2
( 4%)
|
| 45 - Overall Total | |
| Notice-ability of the new signs | |
| 3 |
- 15
( 34%)
|
| 2 |
- 11
( 25%)
|
| 5 |
- 11
( 25%)
|
| 4 |
- 4
( 9%)
|
| 1 |
- 3
( 7%)
|
| 44 - Overall Total | |
|
Township Signage--Many townships demarcate their borders, though many existing signs are inconsistent, is better and consistent signage important?: (1=least imoprtant, 5=most important) How important are consistent township signs? | |
| 4 |
- 12
( 26%)
|
| 5 |
- 12
( 26%)
|
| 3 |
- 12
( 26%)
|
| 2 |
- 8
( 17%)
|
| 1 |
- 2
( 4%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |
| Cowan Lake Signage--Although Caesar’s Creek State Park is demarcated with standard signage on I-71, Cowan Lake State Park is not, how important is it to note the location of Cowan Lake?: (1=least important, 5=most important) | |
| 5 |
- 20
( 43%)
|
| 4 |
- 11
( 24%)
|
| 3 |
- 10
( 22%)
|
| 2 |
- 4
( 9%)
|
| 1 |
- 1
( 2%)
|
| 46 - Overall Total | |